[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: prefix / Re: Masterplan
From: |
Braden McDaniel |
Subject: |
Re: prefix / Re: Masterplan |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jan 2003 19:09:44 -0500 |
On Mon, 2003-01-20 at 15:53, Guido Draheim wrote:
> Peter Simons schrieb:
> > Guido Draheim writes:
> >
> > AX_ENABLE_DYNAMIC_LINKING
> > AX_HAVE_OPENGL
> >
> > There is no need to have another prefix following the "AX", as in
> >
> > AX_<author-initials>_HAVE_OPENGL
>
> aaahm, not quite - remember we might need to change "names" of
> macros quite heavily even when for the same target topic. Therefore,
> we need a scheme to allow for a "family" of macros that target
> the same problem area. _How_ that extra sibling attribution is
> done, well, there are numerous ways, and I would not exclude
> author-intials (or project intials) in either the middle or
> appended.
I disagree:
1. I don't think the archive should have macros that do exactly the
same thing.
2. Macros that do different things should have names that differ by
more than an arbitrary disambiguation prefix.
--
Braden McDaniel e-mail: <address@hidden>
<http://endoframe.com> Jabber: <address@hidden>
obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool / Re: Masterplan, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
- Re: obsoleted vs acinclude tool, Guido Draheim, 2003/01/23
Submission Procedure (was: obsoleted vs acinclude tool), Peter Simons, 2003/01/20
Re: Submission Procedure (was: obsoleted vs acinclude tool), Guido Draheim, 2003/01/20