[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QEF_C_NORETURN / Re: Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro
From: |
Geoff Richards |
Subject: |
Re: QEF_C_NORETURN / Re: Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:38:11 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i |
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 06:51:21PM +0100, Guido Draheim wrote:
> We can mark it "obsolete" - do you have a pointer as to
> what should be used instead? From my own experiences I was
> using the plain gcc version to check for any __attribute__
> marks. So the obsoletion hint would look like:
> dnl obsoleted: check __GNUC__+0 >= 2 && __GNUC_MINOR__+0 >= 5
Yep, that sounds like a much better way of checking it.
cheers,
Geoff
> Geoff Richards wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 01:01:23PM +1100, Tom Howard wrote:
> >
> >>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>Hash: SHA1
> >>
> >>Dear Geoff Richards,
> >>
> >>as you know, the contents of the GNU Autoconf Macro
> >>Archive <http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive/> is
> >>currently licensed under the GNU GPL with this special
> >>exception:
> >>
> >>http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive/htmldoc/COPYING-Exception.html
> >>
> >>This construct turned out to come with some unexpected
> >>legal problems, which are summarized in this article:
> >>
> >>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/ac-archive-maintainers/2005-01/msg00030.html
> >>
> >>To fix these problems, we would like to re-release all
> >>macros in the Archive under an all-permissive license,
> >>which is described near the end of the page
> >><http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/License-Notices.html>
> >>and which looks like this:
> >>
> >> Copying and distribution of this file, with or without
> >> modification, are permitted in any medium without
> >> royalty provided the copyright notice and this notice
> >> are preserved.
> >>
> >>To do that, however, we need your permission -- and this
> >>is what this e-mail is about.
> >>
> >>Would you agree to re-release your Autoconf macro(s)
> >>
> >>QEF_C_NORETURN
> >>
> >>under the terms of this all-permissive license instead of
> >>the GPL-with-exception one?
> >
> >
> > That macro is probably best thrown away, but yes, you have
> > my permission to relicense it.
> >
> > yours,
> > Geoff
> >
>
> --
> -- guido http://google.de/search?q=guidod
> GCS/E/S/P C++/++++$ ULHS L++w- N++@ s+:a d(+-) r+@>+++ y++ 5++X- (geekcode)
--
--- Geoff Richards -------------><-------------- http://ungwe.org/ ---
"I tried to fling my shadow at the moon,
The while my blood leapt with a wordless song." -- Theodore Roethke
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, (continued)
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
- Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/18
RE: Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Dean Povey, 2005/01/18
Re: Re-licensing your Autoconf Macro, Tom Howard, 2005/01/19