[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?
From: |
Kai Sterker |
Subject: |
Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready? |
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2002 14:10:39 +0200 |
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:19:08 +0200 Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Oops, btw: something to put in the NEWS and ChangeLog files of
> wastesedge? (and maybe the NEWS of adonthell, as well).
Hm. I could write up something for the changelog. But what would go into
the NEWS file? Right now it more or less contains the changelog ;).
Maybe just a link to the news page. Or the contents of the news page?
> I also am having troubles autogen'ing adonthell at university.
> AM_PATH_SDL, AM_PATH_VORBIS and the libtools macros aren't available
> on my system. Actually I think that we screwed up when we assume that
> they should be available on the system provided the development
> packages are installed. They are on this machine, but I guess the
> "standard" way to proceed is to include all the script into the
> aclocal.m4 (we can have several .m4 files in the root directory, this
> is no problem and is maybe cleaner). What do you think about it?
Sure. I think we wanted to do this anyway, some time ago ;).
Kai
- [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Kai Sterker, 2002/09/17
- Re: Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Nils Fohrbeck, 2002/09/17
- Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Kai Sterker, 2002/09/18
- Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/09/18
- Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Alexandre Courbot, 2002/09/18
- Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Kai Sterker, 2002/09/18
Re: Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, peweeF, 2002/09/18
Re: Re: [Adonthell-general] 0.3.3 ready?, Nils Fohrbeck, 2002/09/18