[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Aspell-user] Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port a lot faster
From: |
Doug Nelson |
Subject: |
[Aspell-user] Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port a lot faster |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Sep 2008 18:27:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708) |
Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port supposed to be a lot faster than simply
invoking aspell via a batch file? If it is faster, is the time savings
mainly due to not having to "compile" the perl code every time it's
invoked? Is my question making sense? Every time I call aspell (either
in a command prompt or from a cobol application on windows), it takes at
least 10 seconds just to present the interface and I am using pretty
good hardware.
------
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and
may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this
information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and
delete the original message from your mail system.
- [Aspell-user] Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port a lot faster,
Doug Nelson <=