[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS
From: |
Damien Cassou |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:34:40 +0100 |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Ralf Angeli <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I agree with Tassilo, that would allow us to get rid of cvs entirely.
>> Moreover, that would let me easily handle the 2 patches I sent to the
>> mailing list that were not merged (yet?).
>
> That's because we haven't concluded our discussion on the patches yet.
> Switching the VCS won't help with that.
That's ok if the patches take time to merge, I can perfectly
understand. However, a DVCS would allow me to easily maintain my own
fork :-).
--
Damien Cassou
http://damiencassou.seasidehosting.st
"Lambdas are relegated to relative obscurity until Java makes them
popular by not having them." James Iry
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, (continued)
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Michael Albinus, 2011/02/07
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Ralf Angeli, 2011/02/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Tassilo Horn, 2011/02/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Ralf Angeli, 2011/02/08
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Tassilo Horn, 2011/02/09
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Damien Cassou, 2011/02/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Ralf Angeli, 2011/02/10
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS,
Damien Cassou <=
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [AUCTeX] Inverse Search with Evince & DBUS, Tassilo Horn, 2011/02/11