[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [patch] Update of dinbrief.el
From: |
Dr. Werner Fink |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [patch] Update of dinbrief.el |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:12:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:49:39PM +0100, Ralf Angeli wrote:
> * Werner Fink (2011-02-09) writes:
>
> > I'd like to submit a patch to make the dinbriefl LaTeX style work
> > together with the current available dinbrief class style found at
> > the TeX archive of tug.org.
>
> Thanks!
>
> AFAIK you don't have a copyright assignment for AUCTeX on file at the
> FSF. Would it be possible for you to assign the copyright for your
> changes in AUCTeX to the FSF? If this is the case, I'll send you a
> request form via private mail.
As long as the line with the author remains, you may assign
copyright to FSF.
> Also, the patch could then be installed right away because this won't
> negatively affect the copyright assignment situation for the file.
>
> There are a few things in the patch I'd like to change, though. For
> example `TeX-deactivate-mark' is already defined in tex.el and the
> functions in a style file should be prefixed with LaTeX-<package-name>-.
> If you don't mind I'll fix these issues after applying the patch.
The problem was that there was a difference between XEmacs and
GNU-Emacs. If this is fixed in the meanwhile there is no
need for the definition, that is it could be removed.
Beside this ... maybe it would be a good idea to be able to
use UTF-8 for the german word `Empfänger'.
Werner
--
"Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having
a peeing section in a swimming pool." -- Edward Burr