[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:40:41 +0100 |
Hi Tassilo,
2013/2/18 Tassilo Horn <address@hidden>:
> But then, I don't understand the problem. When `multi-prompt-key-value'
> is called, the (require 'crm) will signal an error if there's no crm.el
> on the load-path. And if there is a crm.el, `crm-separator' cannot be
> undefined.
I have `crm.el'. As I've already said, usually it works without
problems, `crm-separator' is defined and has the correct value ("," if
not otherwise specified), it's only the sequence of steps I've
reported that breaks something, but I can't find what neither why.
Did you try to reproduce the error?
Bye,
Mosè Giordano
- [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Mosè Giordano, 2013/02/15
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Mosè Giordano, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el,
Mosè Giordano <=
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, David Kastrup, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, David Kastrup, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Patch for multi-prompt.el, Tassilo Horn, 2013/02/18