[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^»
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^» |
Date: |
Thu, 03 Sep 2015 18:51:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
> On 09/03/2015 11:49 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
>
>
> Uwe Brauer <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> I strongly recommend to include the code in Auctex, maybe with a
>> additional variable, something like this
>
> It's far from perfect. For example, if you have some spurious ^ or _
> somewhere in your text (not in some math) you won't see it at all. And
> AUCTeX's font-latex does not raise/lower scripts on multiple levels,
> e.g., with x^y^z the y and the z have the same size and are equally
> raised.
Uh, correct? That's an error anyway. Are you talking about x^{y^z}
instead?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^», Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/03
- [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing] (was: sub and superscripts: without «_» and «^»), Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Tassilo Horn, 2015/09/04
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] [some testing], Uwe Brauer, 2015/09/05