Re: [AUCTeX] fill-paragraph and fold mode

[Levon Saldamli]

I think that's correct. The problem is in lstlisting in my case. And yes,
correct indentation seems to solve the problem.

But I think one problem is if one wants to put e.g. lstlisting in a figure. 
Then it's
natural to indent the \begin{}-\end{} pair. Although the contents will probably 
have
extra indentation, so it is still a problem. But the wrong fontifying is 
annoying
in this case.

Best regards,
Levon

Ralf Angeli wrote:
> [Redirecting to the mailing list.]
>
> * Levon Saldamli (2005-05-11) writes:
>
>
> > Actually, it's not that annoying. I just thought it should be
> > reported.
> >
> > What is more annoying is that fontifying sometimes misses the end of
> > an environment, and fontifies large parts of the text wrongly. I
> > think its something about indentation, i.e. it seems to depend on
> > indentation instead of just checking \end{...}
> >
> > Should I report that as a separate bug?
>
>
> Sounds like verbatim and verbatim-like environments.  AFAIK at least
> \end{verbatim} must not have indentation as otherwise there will
> appear an empty line in the output file after the verbatim
> environment.  That's why the verbatim environment is indented to
> column 0.  And font locking gives a hint that something is wrong.
>
> The mechanisms behind that is used for verbatim-like environments like
> lstlisting as well, although they do not require to be indented to
> column 0.  I think inhibiting indentation is useful nevertheless
> because you don't have to fiddle with lstlisting's gobble option.  But
> maybe font locking should be a bit more liberal and not enforce this
> indentation.  Of course, the warning function in case of the verbatim
> environment would be sacrificed if this was implemented.
>
> I tend to change font locking.  What do others think?
>
> Uh, if my guess about verbatim environments was wrong, feel free to
> report a separate bug.