[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas
From: |
EglobalpresS |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Feb 2016 18:26:04 +0100 |
A lion as a logo it sounds good
> El 23/02/2016, a las 13:34, David Kastrup <address@hidden> escribió:
>
> Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> 2016-02-23 12:07 GMT+01:00 EglobalpresS <address@hidden>:
>>> What do you think about develop a logo with a bit movement?
>>
>> Do you mean an animated logo? If so, it can't be a GIF, see
>> https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html
>
> Which starts with
>
> There is no special patent threat to GIF format nowadays as far as
> we know; the patents that were used to attack GIF have
> expired. Nonetheless, this article will remain pertinent as long as
> programs can be forbidden by patents, since the same sorts of things
> could happen in any area of computing. See our web site policies
> regarding GIFs, and our web guidelines.
>
> which leads to
>
> In the past, GIFs have had patent problems. However, now that the
> IBM and Unisys patents (and other patents world-wide that are
> relevant to LZW compression) have expired, GIFs that are based on
> the 87a or 89a standard are acceptable. Please be wary of
> proprietary applications that may include non-standard patented
> technologies (we'd prefer you use free software applications when
> authoring for our websites). In general, PNG or JPEG format, are
> still safe, and are probably better from a technical standpoint. For
> details regarding the old GIF problem, see
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gif.html. Other formats are also
> allowed, though JPEG is the one most widely recognized by Web
> browsers (be careful with JPEG 2000, as well as PNG alpha channels,
> as it includes features not fully supported by older browsers).
>
> That being said, I consider animated logos highly rude. They distract
> from the content.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
- [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mosè Giordano, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mandar Mitra, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, EglobalpresS, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mosè Giordano, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, David Kastrup, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, EglobalpresS, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas,
EglobalpresS <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mosè Giordano, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, David Kastrup, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mosè Giordano, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mandar Mitra, 2016/02/23
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Marcin Borkowski, 2016/02/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Janusz S. Bien, 2016/02/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Hoffmann, Jobst, 2016/02/24
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, EglobalpresS, 2016/02/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, EglobalpresS, 2016/02/25
- Re: [AUCTeX] Logo for AUCTeX: request for ideas, Mosè Giordano, 2016/02/26