Re: [AUCTeX] (New?) No indentation in some circumstances

[Denis Bitouzé]

Le 19/06/16 à 18h18, Denis Bitouzé a écrit :

> consider the following minimal `.dtx' example:
>
> [...]
>
> The content of the \blah macro can be indented as usually with the TAB
> key.
>
> But, I guess because of the disruptive two \begin{tabular} for only
> one \end{tabular}, the content of the \blih macro cannot be properly
> indented.

This happens with a plain `.tex' file as well:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{xifthen}
\begin{document}
\newcommand{\blah}{%
  \textbf{%
    blah%
  }%
}
\newcommand*{\bleh}{%
  address@hidden
    \begin{tabular}{l}
      }{%
      \begin{tabular}{r}
        }%
        bleh
      \end{tabular}
      }
      \newcommand{\blih}[1]{%
      \textbf{%
      blih%
      }%
      }
\end{document}
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
-- 
Denis