[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Australia-public-discuss] Video/audio from patents talk and committ
Re: [Australia-public-discuss] Video/audio from patents talk and committee hearing
Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:55:08 +0000
> With regards to TRIPS, I don't think anyone allows patents of Maths.
Well, TRIPS only sets a minimum of what has to be patentable.
Countries can allow patents on math or software if they like.
In the US, a CAFC judge recently ruled that software is math, and math
is patentable if "as a practical matter, the use of a computer is
> And Europe clearly excludes "Software as such", and this was tested in
> their parliament.
The law (EPC art 52) excludes "software as such", but the European
Patent Office grants software patents anyway, and the courts sometimes
So in a theoretical sense (just reading the law), there are no valid
software patents in Europe. But if you ask a software developer who's
been threatened with EPO-granted patents, or who's been found guilty of
patent infringement by a judge, they'll tell you that software patents
are quite real in Europe :-(
The Symbian and Halliburton rulings in the UK are two examples:
There's also an example in Germany, and one I've yet to confirm in the
There's also a page there about free software exceptions:
(en.swpat.org is the publicly-editable wiki hosted by ESP. You're all
invited to add to and develop it.)
+32 485 118 029 (<-NEW),
Please help build the software patents wiki: