australia-public-discuss
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Australia-public-discuss] cutting the red tape


From: Daniel Black
Subject: Re: [Australia-public-discuss] cutting the red tape
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 11:01:03 +1100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 05/12/14 10:46, Ciarán O'Riordan wrote:
> Are these used against software developers?  They could be, but I haven't
> heard of it happening.

Me neither, if so why are they being registered?

> But maybe this is an opportunity to tell the government that if they want to
> cut down on red tape they need to remove certain categories of things from
> the normal patent system.  Such as software.

That's what the ACIP review recommends #5, "Amend subsections 18(3) and
18(4) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) to provide that, for the purposes of
innovation patents, no method, process or system shall be patentable."
effectively does.

> Some politicians believe raising standards is an answer, but this won't
> reduce administrative work.

Current government seems to subscribe to less restrictions (unless its
chaplains in schools or some idealogical bent but I digress).

> ...
> But excluding a domain from patentability leads to a clear reduction in
> administrative load.  If you remove software, then software patents don't
> have to be examined at all, and there'd be no point in re-submitting a
> rejected application.
> 
> My suggestion for a submission would be: "exclude software from innovation
> patents, and doing the same for normal patents would be an even bigger
> saving".

Sounds very worth while.

ACIP's rational for innovation patents also applies for full patents,
just probably wasn't put that way because full patents weren't under review.

Some measure of success from NZ's implementation of this would be good.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUgPW4AAoJEMXeEgVQ15xMPYEIAJIVqUye7keYA+Ug8/BzBGJS
+/svxarmMO0dU8cOa11J24Plyz/v2QCrKaWn7J/EoyDTtmGzgG8GQ57QmqUdl/+D
Rul+N9ODKotHRc2y2t6m8b3HehCnuX6DdYjmZ6NjcjTmCt8AlenzbNZdF22y3W5Q
5KZkY1lIud6B19/FZ0JivjpxayOHhYubeypC1iay+fa71u3ztI1vVnoLvjEXBRkN
T1/fpXDxEbduvLnQqy9L9W0Y8Iscs+mqQTER8BqJ1O9ycWsnZw2dod6/zgp/qzMA
dLsLkMA80E8jpdBBZ/nY1RL83Q5aaehvgC3Yon83QXyy77ZsxzekjpN5BZa3I4U=
=Zvq7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]