[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Aug 2005 22:27:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Paul,
* Paul Eggert wrote on Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 08:54:22PM CEST:
> Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > I apologize that I haven't published our results earlier.
>
> No need to apologize! It's low priority, surely, since nobody really
> needs /usr/xpg4/bin/awk. Every Solaris implementation has nawk, and
> nawk will work.
>
> Perhaps we ought to filter out Solaris /usr/xpg4/bin/awk in our check
> for valid awk implementations, by using this test case. If it has
> this bug, it's likely to have others. Hardly anybody uses this Awk,
> so there's little surprise that it's buggy. (But this is low priority
> too.)
I thought it was a feature of this macro that it does not require
AC_PROG_AWK but call plain `awk', and therefore implemented all these
nasty workarounds?
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, (continued)
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/17
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/17
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/19
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/25
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/25
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/26
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/26
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/28
- Re: AT_KEYWORDS failure: cmdline OR-combinations, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/08/28