[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_EXEEXT
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_EXEEXT |
|
Date: |
15 May 2001 19:19:25 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <address@hidden> writes:
Ralf> Hi,
Hi!
Ralf> With autoconf-cvs AC_EXEEXT doesn't do anything anymore. I.e.
Ralf> configure-scripts which are using AC_EXEEXT, but do not
Ralf> explicitly call AC_PROG_CC, silently break with autoconf-cvs
Ralf> (@EXEEXT@ will not be substituted).
Ralf> Can't autoconf at least warn about using AC_EXEEXT w/o
Ralf> AC_PROG_CC?
Hm, does EXEEXT make sense when there are no binaries? I mean,
shouldn't it be defined to nothing. And in fact, how come it is used
if there are no binaries?
- AC_EXEEXT, Ralf Corsepius, 2001/05/15
- Re: AC_EXEEXT,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: AC_EXEEXT, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/19