[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53
From: |
akim |
Subject: |
Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53 |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Apr 2002 15:42:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 08:58:13AM -0400, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> On 8 Apr 2002, Akim Demaille wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Patrick" == Patrick Hartling <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> > Patrick> So I can't have a configure.in that works with 2.13 and 2.5x?
> >
> > Sure you can.
>
> it's just that you cannot count on that happening without some effort.
I know few programming languages which accept programs ``without some
effort.''
- Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Patrick Hartling, 2002/04/05
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/04/05
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Patrick Hartling, 2002/04/05
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Peter Eisentraut, 2002/04/05
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Patrick Hartling, 2002/04/05
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/08
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Thomas E. Dickey, 2002/04/08
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53,
akim <=
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Mike Castle, 2002/04/11
- Re: Bad configure scripts generated with Autoconf 2.52 and 2.53, Akim Demaille, 2002/04/12