[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS w/ backward-compatibility?
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_LIBOBJ vs LIBOBJS w/ backward-compatibility? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 07 Apr 2003 15:29:24 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090017 (Oort Gnus v0.17) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Pekka Savola <address@hidden> writes:
|> Hi,
|>
|> I've a configure.in file which uses LIBOBJS which I can port to use
|> AC_LIBOBJ just fine.
|>
|> However, there is no form which could be made to work on both autoconf
|> 2.13 and autoconf >= 2.53: AC_LIBOBJ is not supported in the
|> former, and LIBOBJS fails in the latter.
|>
|> Is there a way to move to AC_LIBOBJ in a backward-compatible manner?
|> For example, is there a nice conditional macro definition for AC_LIBOBJ
|> that could be applied as necessary (I don't think so), or some other
|> mechanism?
How about using ifdef([AC_LIBOBJ],,AC_DEFUN([AC_LIBOBJ], ...))?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, address@hidden
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."