[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT? |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 11:31:03 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
> In a discussion about the AC_FC_FREEFORM macro (which figures out how
> to enable freeform-source support for Fortran, if possible), Akim
> wrote:
[...]
Steven, you don't seem to read my messages in another thread,
precisely related to this:
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/autoconf-patches/2003-10/msg00116.html
Could we continue there?
- justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/10
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?,
Akim Demaille <=
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/14
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/15
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/15
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/17
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/18
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/21
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/19
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Akim Demaille, 2003/11/21
- Re: justification for AC_LANG_ASSERT?, Steven G. Johnson, 2003/11/20