[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf 2.60?
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf 2.60? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:05:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i [Guile enabled] |
Hi,
Today, 18 minutes, 24 seconds ago, Paul Eggert wrote:
> I plan to review the Debian patches before putting out the 2.59b
> tarball. If you know of any important patches in other distributions,
> please let me know. (I don't have time to look at all the distros.)
I just noticed that for some reason I did not receive your message [1]
regarding the read-only variables issue [0].
It turns out that your patch is fine with Bash because Bash simply
prints an error message and then goes on executing the script. However,
Tru64's, IRIX' and HPUX' /bin/sh really _stop_ the script. In other
words, the following script prints "hello" when /bin/sh is Bash, and
doesn't otherwise:
#!/bin/sh
ENV=sdf
readonly ENV
unset ENV
echo "hello"
Thanks,
Ludovic.
[0] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2004-06/msg00014.html
[1] http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-autoconf/2004-06/msg00019.html
- Autoconf 2.60?, Kelley Cook, 2004/06/22
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Paul Eggert, 2004/06/22
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Paul Eggert, 2004/06/22
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Ludovic Courtès, 2004/06/23
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Paul Eggert, 2004/06/23
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Ludovic Courtès, 2004/06/24
- Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Paul Eggert, 2004/06/24
Re: Autoconf 2.60?, Ben Pfaff, 2004/06/24