[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test? |
Date: |
Thu, 26 May 2005 09:50:29 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello Ed,
> This code seems to work fine, but am I missing something?
I guess that if you experience no problems, you can use the code.
The advice ``perform all tests unconditionally'' is a workaround
to fix current limitations of the implementation.
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:08:30PM +0200, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> There is AS_IF, but it's rather a kludge than a solution.
Ralf, please note that AS_IF fixes this only in CVS version of autoconf.
Autoconf 2.59 has m4_define([AS_IF], which means it is no better than
shell if.
(Sorry, Ed, if this paragraph is to cryptic.)
Have a nice day,
Stepan Kasal
- to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ed Hartnett, 2005/05/20
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/05/25
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?,
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Stepan Kasal, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/05/27
- Re: to conditionally test, or not to conditionally test?, Stepan Kasal, 2005/05/27