autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Handling of extra macros


From: Patrick Welche
Subject: Re: Handling of extra macros
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 23:55:51 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.10

On Thu, Dec 01, 2005 at 09:38:31PM +0100, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> >>> "RB" == Ross Boylan <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>  RB> 5. The autoconf manual has no index entry for aclocal.  There is one for
>  RB> aclocal.m4, and the text refers to aclocal.  Is aclocal deprecated?
> 
> aclocal is part of Automake, not autoconf.  The Automake manual
> documents aclocal and explains how to handle local macros properly.

Isn't the long term goal "aclocal must be subsumed into autoconf"? What is
preventing this from happening sooner rather than later?

Cheers,

Patrick




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]