[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility? |
Date: |
Tue, 09 May 2006 22:28:49 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.2 (Windows/20060308) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ben Pfaff on 5/9/2006 8:49 PM:
>
> One option open to me is to package and upload a 2.59 pre-release
> to Debian "unstable". I imagine that this would lead to more
> widespread testing of the pre-release, which might work to catch
> incompatibilities in advance of the final 2.60 release.
2.59c is intended to be such a pre-release; we are at a feature freeze, so
that the only changes between 2.59c and 2.60 should be bug fixes.
>
> Any comments on whether this is a good idea?
Yes, I would go for it.
- --
Life is short - so eat dessert first!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFEYWwB84KuGfSFAYARAjJ7AJ43em0g9YFsAZWr4DZsBqwU4BAu7gCgv2H/
WjqEGJww4Fa2VjIOyY6n3Vs=
=mJqI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Noah Misch, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/09
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/10
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/13
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Paul Eggert, 2006/05/14
- Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ben Pfaff, 2006/05/14
Re: expected Autoconf 2.59 <-> 2.60 compatibility?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/05/10