autoconf
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: newby question: to use or not to use ?


From: Benoit SIGOURE
Subject: Re: newby question: to use or not to use ?
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2007 12:36:24 +0200

On Jul 7, 2007, at 10:11 AM, Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote:

I like the following features the most:

* Cross-compilation support
* Building in another directory
* Targets like clean, distclean, etc.
* Ease of adding new binaries and libraries (both internal and external)
* Testing framework integration

I'd add at least:
* Ease of configuration (different platforms come with libraries in different places, it's much easier to invoke configure --with- libfoo=path than having to change some file to specify that path... especially once you automate your builds in a buildfarm) * Targets like distcheck, install DESTDIR=... or install prefix=... (sandboxing made easy) * libtool!! It's one of the most complete and convenient component of the autotools, it solves a hell lot of problems when you build on lots of platforms.


For us, these features do save costs in the long run; the configuration
files are much more maintainable than custom shell scripts and
makefiles.

As I said above, the main difficulty is to understand how all this works
and to figure out how to do a certain thing -- this may be very
time-consuming.

For the beginners I recommend these slides:
http://www-src.lip6.fr/homepages/Alexandre.Duret-Lutz/dl/autotools.pdf

--
Benoit Sigoure aka Tsuna
EPITA Research and Development Laboratory


Attachment: PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]