[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Aug 2007 11:02:37 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-07-25) |
* Roman Rybalko wrote on Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 11:00:23AM CEST:
>
> > aclocal will use the value of ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS in your top-level
> > Makefile.am, so you can do something like:
> > ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS = -I build-aux
> Is it really works ?
If there is something you tried and it did not work as expected, then
please show what you did so we can try to reproduce it.
> I tried this somewhen, but it wasn't working.
> Anybody, tell me plz the docs about this. I've red some docs, but don't
> found any info about this. Thx.
<http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/manual/html_node/autoreconf-Invocation.html>
<http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Local-Macros>
<http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Rebuilding>
Hope that helps.
Cheers,
Ralf
- autoreconf vs autogen.sh, David Bruce, 2007/08/24
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/25
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Benoit SIGOURE, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Roman Rybalko, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/27
- Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/27
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Noah Misch, 2007/08/25
Re: autoreconf vs autogen.sh, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/08/25