[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autorescan?
|
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
|
Subject: |
Re: autorescan? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 2 Jul 2008 07:42:50 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
* Tim Post wrote on Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 07:39:01AM CEST:
> I've been including most checks that autoscan suggests. My reasoning is
> that someone down the line might need those checks and may not be able
> to autoreconf in order to include them. Probably bad practice ...
Not necessarily. But likely it leads to more configure tests than are
really needed.
Cheers,
Ralf