[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf and apt
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf and apt |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:21:03 -0500 (CDT) |
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, Allan Clark wrote:
I therefore urge you to reconsider using existing resources for more common
cases rather than serial dependencies on new, undiscovered data and 100%
coverage which might be too difficult to reach.
You are optimizing the special case where dependencies are to be
installed from "packages" but this package is configured via a
configure script. Most users who install packages install "packages"
prepared by someone else and never run a configure script. They might
not even have a working compiler installed on their system.
Perhaps what is needed is a new "--list-dependencies" option which
prints prepared text listing the possible dependencies of this
package. It is not clear how well this will work though since many
Linux developers do not know the dependencies of their own software.
They just expect these dependencies to be automatically available as
part of the Linux distribution.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: Autoconf and apt, (continued)
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Tim Post, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Erik de Castro Lopo, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Allan Clark, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Braden McDaniel, 2008/08/19
- Re: Autoconf and apt, Tim Post, 2008/08/19
Re: Autoconf and apt, Ben Pfaff, 2008/08/19