[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: m4_text_box => AS_TEXT_BOX?
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: m4_text_box => AS_TEXT_BOX? |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Oct 2008 15:21:02 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Paolo Bonzini <bonzini <at> gnu.org> writes:
> m4_text_box is the sole user of quadrigraphs in m4sugar.m4.
Nope. m4_text_wrap also uses it.
> Together
> with m4_warn, in turn, it is the sole feature needing autom4te.
True; autom4te is mainly for quadrigraph, warning, and trace post-processing.
> I don't
> care about m4_warn very much, but it would be nice to rename m4_text_box
> to AS_TEXT_BOX and move it to m4sh.
It's not that easy. There is already an AS_TEXT_BOX, and it has different
semantics (while m4_text_box always outputs a flower box at the current moment,
AS_TEXT_BOX is polymorphic, and outputs a text box around $foo or `command`
that matches the length of the output; something that m4_text_box cannot do).
> Bison does not use it, and Google says it is unused:
Except that m4_text_wrap is heavily used (and even bison uses it).
--
Eric Blake