[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: including autoconf paths in source
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: including autoconf paths in source |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 14:15:03 +0100 |
On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 07:52 -0500, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>
> >> compiler, or test-application). Putting them in the generated config.h
> >> doesn't run into that problem.
> > Only if done properly.
>
> I agree (of course: putting them into the generated config.h is assumed
> to be "done properly").
This approach typically trips directory expansion problems. It's bad
advise to new-comers
> For the rest - your example doesn't address the
> specific case I had in mind,
Which? Or course, the details vary in specific cases, nevertheless this
trick is pretty mighty.
> so it's perhaps useful advice for another
> topic.
automake's toplevel configury applies this trick - It's borrowed from
there ;)
Ralf
- including autoconf paths in source, Monty Taylor, 2008/12/11
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Eric Blake, 2008/12/11
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Thomas Dickey, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, John Calcote, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Ralf Corsepius, 2008/12/12
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Monty Taylor, 2008/12/20
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/12/20
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Eric Blake, 2008/12/20
- Re: including autoconf paths in source, Monty Taylor, 2008/12/20