Re: AT_CHECK within for loop

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Joel E. Denny wrote on Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 08:06:38PM CET:
> A way to get the best of both worlds might be to permit shell functions 
> containing AT_CHECK to be defined outside of AT_SETUP.  I believe that is 
> not possible with autotest now, and I have no idea if it's feasible to 
> implement.

That is possible right now, either in atlocal.in or in PREPARE_TESTS
diversions:

m4_divert_push([PREPARE_TESTS])dnl
function_defined_once ()
{
  ...
}
m4_divert_pop([PREPARE_TESTS])dnl

Cheers,
Ralf