[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency |
Date: |
Tue, 06 Mar 2012 12:10:21 +0100 (CET) |
> However, I do wonder why GNU tar can't be smart enough to figure out
> what you meant when untarring with -z? I get why we need -j and -J
> for creating archives, but when unpacking them, what's wrong with
> using magic numbers to detect the compression format?
On Mac OS X Lion, this actually happens: Regardless of the compression
algorithm, you always use `-z' while extracting.
Werner
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, (continued)
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Mike Frysinger, 2012/03/02
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, James K. Lowden, 2012/03/03
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Mike Frysinger, 2012/03/03
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, James K. Lowden, 2012/03/03
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Mike Frysinger, 2012/03/03
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, James K. Lowden, 2012/03/03
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Warren Young, 2012/03/06
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Alberto Luaces, 2012/03/06
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Olaf Lenz, 2012/03/06
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency, Warren Young, 2012/03/06
- Re: Autoconf distributions and xz dependency,
Werner LEMBERG <=