[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles
From: |
NightStrike |
Subject: |
Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles |
Date: |
Sat, 15 Dec 2012 20:46:40 -1000 |
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 12/15/2012 03:08 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>>
>> Is the program designed to remove old core
>> files as part of the autoconf process?
>
>
> No, new cores. 'configure' regularly generates
> programs that dump core, as part of its ordinary
> working procedure.
Why not just use ulimit to not dump core? Or is that a bashism and not a shism?
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, (continued)
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Marko Lindqvist, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/12/08
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Eric Blake, 2012/12/10
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Jeffrey Walton, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Marko Lindqvist, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/15
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles,
NightStrike <=
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/12/16
- Re: RE : RE : rm -f core cause some troubles, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/16
Re: rm -f core cause some troubles, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/12/08
Re: rm -f core cause some troubles, John Hawkinson, 2012/12/08