[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR vs m4_include
From: |
Brandon Invergo |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR vs m4_include |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:19:50 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Nick Bowler <address@hidden> writes:
> Despite documentation to the contrary, until recently (and not in the
> tool versions you are using), AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR never actually did
> anything at all. For this reason alone, I strongly recommend not
> specifying it.
OK, good to know. Thanks!
> Since you say you are using Automake (although your snippet above does
> not include an AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE call, I assume this is an oversight),
Sorry, I only mentioned Automake because it provides aclocal. Automake
itself isn't actually being used in this case.
> Regardless, aclocal's functionality should not be confused with
> m4_include. The latter is a core feature of the Autoconf language,
> whereas aclocal is just a tool to automatically generate an aclocal.m4
> file which
>
> (a) copies the relevant Automake macros into your project, and
> (b) includes (using m4_include) your local project macros based on
> some loose text matching.
>
> Hope that helps,
Yep, makes sense. I'll just go ahead with m4_include then.
Thanks again for your help!
-brandon
--
Brandon Invergo
http://brandon.invergo.net
pgp29nclAuyzK.pgp
Description: PGP signature