[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_HEADER_MAJOR vs. glibc 2.25(-to-be)
|
From: |
Zack Weinberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: AC_HEADER_MAJOR vs. glibc 2.25(-to-be) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 1 Sep 2016 21:08:49 -0400 |
On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> Zack Weinberg wrote:
>> Have I missed either a way to carry out the ideal solution, or a third
>> alternative?
>
> How about changing AC_HEADER_MAJOR to detect those warning messages?
That's difficult, but more importantly it doesn't do any good till we
get an autoconf release out -- and then everyone using AC_HEADER_MAJOR
has to regenerate their configure script and release *their* software.
I'm hoping we can find a solution that can be implemented entirely
within glibc.
zw