[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-NG] [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanu
|
From: |
Akim Demaille |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-NG] [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanup for the dist-related targets |
|
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 09:18:32 +0200 |
Le 10 mai 2012 à 21:48, Bob Friesenhahn a écrit :
> As a development user, I don't care if "make distdir -n" is slower since
> without the -n any such slowness is likely not noticeable since the rest of
> the task is really slow and not done very often. More faithful is important.
>
> Optimizing 'make all' and 'make check' should be the priorities when it comes
> to performance.
Again, I share this opinion :)
- [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanup for the dist-related targets, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/06
- [Automake-ng] [PATCH 2/4] [ng] dist: strip duplicates from dist files at make (not automake) runtime, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/06
- [Automake-ng] [PATCH 1/4] [ng] dist: simplify VPATH handling, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/06
- [Automake-ng] [PATCH 4/4] [ng] dist: optimize calculation of list of distributed file, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/06
- [Automake-ng] [PATCH 3/4] [ng] dist: rename some non-public vars to make clear they are internal, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanup for the dist-related targets, Jim Meyering, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Automake-NG] [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanup for the dist-related targets, Bob Friesenhahn, 2012/05/10
- Re: [Automake-NG] [Automake-ng] [PATCH 0/4] Minor refactoring and cleanup for the dist-related targets, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/05/10