[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS
From: |
Peter Rosin |
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Feb 2013 01:51:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 2013-02-02 01:15, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 02/01/2013 05:00 PM, Peter Rosin wrote:
>> Supporting INCLUDES in automake-NG costs nearly nothing.
>
> This, however, is a statement I'm not willing to concede; so while I
> agree with the decision to deprecate (but not remove) INCLUDES from
> automake, I think it is fair game to state that someone switching to
> Automake-NG should be prepared to avoid INCLUDES, as part of that switch.
Oh. I claim ignorance. I blindly assumed the implementation in -NG
was just as trivial as in plain old Automake. When there are technical
reasons to drop INCLUDES in Automake-NG, it's a totally different
situation. I then agree that it's perfectly ok to issue a (default
visible) deprecation warning in Automake, in order to enable an easy
upgrade path to -NG in the future.
I should have known that the removal wasn't as trivially stupid as
it looked at first sight...
Cheers,
Peter
- Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS, (continued)
Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS, Bob Friesenhahn, 2013/02/01
Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS, Peter Rosin, 2013/02/01
Re: [Automake-NG] Removal of INCLUDES in favour of AM_CPPFLAGS, Akim Demaille, 2013/02/02