[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: question about no-dist patch
|
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
|
Subject: |
Re: question about no-dist patch |
|
Date: |
Wed, 06 Aug 2003 14:07:53 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <address@hidden> writes:
Ralf> On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 11:39, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
>> >>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
>>
Tom> I wonder if it makes sense to require `no-dist' to be set in
Tom> configure.in, and not in some particular Makefile. Thoughts?
[...]
Ralf> configure.ac (w/ automake "make dist" rules)
Ralf> sub1/configure.ac (automake generated w/ no-dist and custom rules)
Ralf> sub2/configure.ac (w/ automake "make dist" rules)
Looking at this example w.r.t. Tom's question, I think it's not
worth trying to forbid no-dist in subdirectories: Makefile.am
authors have to know that they do anyway.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz