[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch: RFA: new option
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: Patch: RFA: new option |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Aug 2003 22:52:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Derek" == Derek Robert Price <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Derek> if a file is in EXTRA_DIST then any cleanup should be
Derek> moved to the maintainer-clean target from whatever
Derek> target it rests in. I think this check could be done
Derek> for all files found in EXTRA_DIST, not just docs?
This is PR/313.
[...]
Derek> Can these two ideas be reconciled?
Are they opposed? One is about not cleaning files which are
ordinarily cleaned, and the other about not distributing files
which usually are. That sounds complementary to me.
Derek> Perhaps with dist_* targets and nodist_* targets?
That would works for *.texi files but not for *.info files.
info files do not appear in any variable. Same issue with
flex and bison output.
(I once wrote a patch to support dist_, nodist_, and noinst_, but I
don't remember why I never applied it entirely
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2002-06/msg00010.html)
Derek> I am not a dentist.
Derek> I am not a dentist.
Derek> I am not a dentist...
Derek>
Derek> - Bart Simpson on chalkboard, _The Simpsons_
I am not a typits.
I amnot a typist.
i m not Typist.
- Me on a keyboard, _The Real Life_
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/04
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/04
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/08/05
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Tom Tromey, 2003/08/06
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/08/06
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Derek Robert Price, 2003/08/07
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Derek Robert Price, 2003/08/11
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/08/12
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Akim Demaille, 2003/08/13
- Re: Patch: RFA: new option, Akim Demaille, 2003/08/13