[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/6] Lex, Yacc and explicit declarations of dependencies.
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/6] Lex, Yacc and explicit declarations of dependencies. |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2010 08:08:30 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
Hi Stefano,
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Mon, Jul 05, 2010 at 01:36:03PM CEST:
> I rebased the patch series against master to resolve some (really
> minor) conflicts; and since I was at it, I updated the ChangeLog to
> tell that the bug addressed by this series affects also Solaris 10
> /usr/xpg4/bin/make (apparently /usr/ccs/make is *not* affected).
> No significant, "real" change was introduced by the rebasing.
>
> Do you want me to repost the updated series, or to open a new branch
> in the Automake official repository and push the patches there? This
> last option would be better IMHO, because the changes introduced by
> this series might be seen as somewhat controversial, so the merge in
> master might not happen soon (in fact, might not happen *at all*); and
> having a remote branch would help in avoiding the bitrotting of the
> series.
Please give me another week to review the series; for that, it shouldn't
be necessary to post updated patches nor push a branch; I have your
patches in an old branch sitting here. If you haven't heard back from
me by next Monday, then feel free to push a branch, but please rebase it
against maint not master, if that is at all possible for the changes in
this series.
> If I'm not mistaken, a remote branch can be deleted anyway in
> the future (in case it turns out to be a dead end).
Yes, that is true.
Cheers,
Ralf