[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches.
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches. |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 21:04:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-04-22) |
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 08:59:17PM CEST:
> At Thursday 15 July 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 12:26:57PM CEST:
> > Bruno prefers the former style, but maybe he accepts a patch to
> > optionally keep the style of the latter even upon rebasing.
> Well, I don't have a copyright assignement for Gnulib, and moreover
> the souce code of git-merge-changelog.c is beyond me ATM... of were
> you saying that you intend to write such a patch yourself?
No time for such endeavors ATM, sorry.
> > I tend to just run another rebase -i to remove the extra
> > headers again,
> That's what I usually did too, but for longer patch series it
> is tedious, error-prone, and spoils the git-merge-changelog
> user experience.
Agreed.
> > or ignore the issue.
> If it's OK with you, this is what I'd like to do :-)
Why not just send a bug report to bug-gnulib, since you already have a
reproducer?
Cheers,
Ralf
- [PATCH + QUESTION] Improve and extend tests `man*.test'., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/12
- Re: [PATCH + QUESTION] Improve and extend tests `man*.test'., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/13
- Re: [PATCH + QUESTION] Improve and extend tests `man*.test'., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/13
- [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/14
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/15
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/15
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/07/15
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/15
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches.,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [QUESTION] Pushing patches., Stefano Lattarini, 2010/07/15