[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT |
Date: |
Sun, 3 Oct 2010 13:30:31 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04) |
Hi Jim,
* Jim Meyering wrote on Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 12:35:57PM CEST:
> * lib/am/distdir.am (dist-xz): Do not hard-code xz's -9: that
> made it impossible to override. Instead, use its XZ_OPT envvar,
> defaulting to -9 if not defined. Thus no change in behavior
> when XZ_OPT is not set, and now, this rule honors the setting
> of that envvar when it is set. Suggested by Lasse Collin.
Thanks. A more general fix for all dist-* compressors, with hopefully
as uniform naming scheme as is possible throughout, and autoconf.texi
and NEWS update, was already on my list of things to do. (There are
some prior bug reports too.)
If you can provide anything, be my guest, otherwise I'll try to either
fix things within a week or so, or take your patch for now. Is that OK?
Thanks,
Ralf
- [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/03
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/04
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Stefano Lattarini, 2010/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/10/05
- Re: [PATCH] dist-xz: don't hard-code -9: honor setting of XZ_OPT, Jim Meyering, 2010/10/05