[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] {maint} tests: new subroutines for test skipping/failing
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] {maint} tests: new subroutines for test skipping/failing |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:27:17 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.30-2-686; KDE/4.4.4; i686; ; ) |
Reference:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-03/msg00052.html>
On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> On Monday 14 March 2011, Stefano Lattarini wrote:
> > Hello Ralf and all automakers.
> >
> > Reference:
> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-01/msg00296.html>
> > Whole original thread:
> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-01/msg00192.html>
> > which stemmed from:
> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-01/msg00144.html>
> >
> > > > Well, what I was trying to say is: what use is TESTS_SETUP if we expand
> > > > to
> > > > $(AM_TESTS_SETUP) $(TESTS_SETUP) $(TESTS_ENVIRONMENT)
> > > >
> > > > ? It can simply be merged into TESTS_ENVIRONMENT; there is no point in
> > > > keeping them separate.
> > > >
> > > > And then, we can rename AM_TESTS_SETUP to AM_TESTS_ENVIRONMENT if we
> > > > like, or not (consistency vs. green bikeshed question).
> > > >
> > > > I'll leave it up to the person who writes the documentation with
> > > > detailed explanation of intended semantics.
> > > >
> > > Attached is my attempt (I'm not sure the new documentation is organized
> > > in the best possible way, though). Tested with "make html pdf".
> > >
> > > BTW, should this patch (or an amndned version of it) go into maint or
> > > into master?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Stefano
> > >
> > A friendly ping on this?
> >
> > The failure to apply this patch is blocking the planned increase
> > of code sharing between gnulib's `tests/init.sh' and automake's
> > `tests/defs', which in turn is blocking the possibility to define
> > and use proper subroutines for test skipping/failing -- which in
> > turn is blocking the improvement/addition of more detailed, clear
> > explanations for test skips.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Stefano
> >
> Ping^2?
>
> I'll push in 72 hours if there are no further objections.
>
> Regards,
> Stefano
>
I've applied the patch to a temporary branch off of maint, merged to
master, and pushed.
Regards,
Stefano
- Re: [PATCH] {maint} tests: new subroutines for test skipping/failing,
Stefano Lattarini <=