Re: Refactoring elisp compilation

[Stefano Lattarini]

On 08/06/2012 12:24 AM, Jack Kelly wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Stefano Lattarini
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 07/23/2012 01:26 PM, Jack Kelly wrote:
>>> I think the way to do this would be as an improvement to make batch
>>> mode more palatable in general. I think an environment variable or a
>>> change to default behaviour is the least-potentially-breaking
>>> solution.
>>>
>> Good.  Do you fancy bringing this up on the Emacs list?  As I said, no
>> need to hurry.
> 
> Done: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-gnu-emacs/2012-08/msg00071.html
>
Thanks.  Let's see how things will work out.  In any case, note that I've
merged the 'elisp-work' branch into master, so you can base your new work
(if any) on there.  I.e., you can fork a new 'elisp-work' branch off of
latest master, rather than building on the top of the old 'elisp-work'
branch; this should avoid extra spurious conflicts when the new work is
to be merged back into master.

> If that doesn't work, I'll look into writing a patch.
> 
>> I can do this.  If you can find an autoconfiscated package that makes a
>> deeper and more complex use of Emacs lisp than Autoconf does, and test
>> with that, it would be great.
> 
> I have not yet done this. I will send a note to myself and try to do
> this in the next day or so.
> 
> -- Jack

Best regards,
  Stefano