[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disabling optimization
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: Disabling optimization |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:41:37 +0100 |
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 11:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > out of curiosity, what would be wrong with the following?
> >
> > if test -n "${CXXFLAGS}"; then
> > CXXFLAGS="-g"
> > fi
> > AC_PROG_CXX
>
> I think you got it backwards. This makes it impossible to override
> CXXFLAGS.
Isn't the snippet below sufficient?
CXXFLAGS=${CXXFLAGS--g}
AC_PROG_CXX
Ralf
- Disabling optimization, Jonathan, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andre Caldas, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Braden McDaniel, 2004/11/17
- Re: Disabling optimization, Stepan Kasal, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Ralf Corsepius, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Thomas 'Tom' R. Treadway III, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andreas Schwab, 2004/11/18
- Re: Disabling optimization, Bob Proulx, 2004/11/19
- Re: Disabling optimization, Andrew Suffield, 2004/11/19