[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: back to directory dependencies
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: back to directory dependencies |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jun 2005 21:34:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
Hi Baurzhan,
* Baurzhan Ismagulov wrote on Tue, Jun 07, 2005 at 06:23:05PM CEST:
>
> But I have another problem with SUBDIRS. As I mentioned in the previous
> thread, specifying -j starts building of l1 and src1 in parallel. l1
> lasts longer, and src1 fails due to missing l1. So I think I really need
> dependencies rather than sequence. What do you think?
Which `make' does that? I can't seem to get GNU make to do so.
(If it's GNU make, the quick'n'dirty solution would be to add
.NOTPARALLEL:
to the toplevel Makefile.am. But that helps only for GNU make.)
Regards,
Ralf
- back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/07
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/06/08
- Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/10
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/06/28
Re: back to directory dependencies, Baurzhan Ismagulov, 2005/06/28