[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions on 'make dist'
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: Questions on 'make dist' |
Date: |
Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:53:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:13:06PM -0400, NightStrike wrote:
> On 3/19/08, Stepan Kasal <address@hidden> wrote:
> > BTW: Why do you insist on the layout described above? I would have
> > one top-level directory and make "doc" and "headers" (or perhaps
> > "hdr") subdirs.
>
> The mingw-w64-headers directory contains headers that are required to
> use the resulting gcc toolchain. They are not required to build
> anything under mingw-w64-crt. I think that is why Kai chose to
> separate them out.
thanks for explanation.
So you can do somethig like:
mingw-w64/crt
mingw-w64/doc
mingw-w64/hdr
so that you can easily describe the doc/something and hdr/something
in the top level makefile, or you just keep this structure and let
make recurse to all three subdirs.
I do not think you should have more than one configure script, and it
should be in the top level directory.
Stepan
- Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/10
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/11
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Stepan Kasal, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist',
Stepan Kasal <=
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Stepan Kasal, 2008/03/19
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/20
- Re: Questions on 'make dist', NightStrike, 2008/03/19