[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silent installs
From: |
Joakim Tjernlund |
Subject: |
Re: silent installs |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jan 2010 11:40:47 +0100 |
"Alfred M. Szmidt" <address@hidden> wrote on 2010/01/29 11:17:24:
>
> And there are many examples of the opposite where less verbose output
> is useful, automake already supports silent compilation. I know that
Yes, but automake --silent is a different tool, perhaps it should
learn suppress the install mgs as well as other libtool msgs
such as relinking as finish msgs?
> I have missed errors or warnings beause having had to much output to
> read, Joakim, would you like to work on a patch for this? I think it
> would be immensly useful.
I don't know where to start even and considering that
silent builds seems to be a very controversial subject
within the autotools maintainers , I think this needs
to come from the maintainers themselves to have any chance
to be accepted.
Jocke
- silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Corsepius, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs,
Joakim Tjernlund <=
- Re: silent installs, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/30
- Re: silent installs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2010/01/31
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/31
- Re: silent installs, Russ Allbery, 2010/01/29
- Re: silent installs, Joakim Tjernlund, 2010/01/29
Re: silent installs, Steffen Dettmer, 2010/01/29