[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please
From: |
Oliver Schulz |
Subject: |
AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Feb 2005 16:50:26 +0100 |
Perhaps http://www.allelectronics.com/spec.html can help you...
Cheers,
Oliver.
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden Im
> Auftrag von James Dessart
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 27. Februar 2005 16:39
> An: address@hidden
> Betreff: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please
>
> I bought an LCD off AllElectronics because it was cheap. I
> knew very little about LCD panels at the time, but hey, it
> was $11. However, since I am such a noob :), I don't know how
> to drive the panel. I've figured out how to latch in the
> data, but I have no idea how to drive the panel's 1/242 duty
> cycle. Is this on the LCD drive voltage? In other words, do I
> drive the voltage to its required level only for 1/242nd of a second?
>
> Thanks,
> James
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AVR-chat mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/avr-chat
>
- [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, James Dessart, 2005/02/27
- Re: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Stephen Wong, 2005/02/27
- AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please,
Oliver Schulz <=
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, James Dessart, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Stephen Wong, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, James Dessart, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Bob Paddock, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, James Dessart, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Christopher X. Candreva, 2005/02/27
- Re: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, James Dessart, 2005/02/27
- RE: AW: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Ben Mann, 2005/02/27
RE: [avr-chat] LCD duty cycles, help please, Rune Christensen, 2005/02/27