Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc bug

[Denis Chertykov]

address@hidden (J Wunsch) writes:

> Denis Chertykov <address@hidden> writes:
> 
> > It's not a bug.
> > GCC optimize dead loops.
> 
> It is.  Counting a wrong value can hardly be described as
> `optimizing'.  Either the loop is optimized out completely (but we've
> been there, this is at least contradictionary to traditional gcc
> behaviour which was IMHO intentional -- but sorry, i can't find the
> reference for this in the gcc info files right now), or it is left
> intact.  Decrementing the loop counter by an arbitrary value can only
> be described by the word `bug'.

Send your question to address@hidden
If you want to know more about loops optimizing,