[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Jul 2002 11:07:35 +0200 (MET DST) |
Marlin Unruh <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have a business partner that thinks we need to purchase our
> compiler. He thinks because avr-gcc is free it must therefore be
> inferior, or as he puts it "non standard". How can I convince him it
> not?
Well, others who know both compilers might perhaps tell a bit more.
> One argument is that Atmel worked with IAR in the silicon
> development stage of the AVR, so they would have the best handle on
> the compiler for it.
Not really. The cooperation of Atmel and IAR brought some changes in
the design of the AVR to make it more compiler-friendly (Atmel
documented the changes somewhere), but in the end, any compiler can
benefit from this.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
avr-gcc-list at http://avr1.org
- [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Marlin Unruh, 2002/08/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Rich Neswold, 2002/08/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Rich Neswold, 2002/08/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Marlin Unruh, 2002/08/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Sander Pool, 2002/08/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/08/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, E. Weddington, 2002/08/05
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, J.C. Wren, 2002/08/05
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Panther Electronics, 2002/08/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Joerg Wunsch, 2002/08/05
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] avr-gcc credibility, Panther Electronics, 2002/08/05