Re: [avr-gcc-list] AVR-GCC dead function elimination??

[eric]

> 
> Eric Waddington suggested (on an AVRFREAKS forum) that I 
should compile 
> each function into a different .o file, build a library 
using these 
> files, and then the linker would selectively include 
the .o files. 
> While it sounds like this would work, it seems like a bit 
of a hack!

That's "Weddington" with an e. :)

And yes, that's the normal way to write a library. And this 
is not just unique to GCC. I've seen this on other, 
commercial cross and native compilers as well.

Eric
Weddington